Paramjeet Singh was arrested by SEF border and immigration inspectors on an extradition request issued by Interpol.
He is wanted by India for alleged involvement in bomb attacks carried out in 2010 in the Patiala and Ambala regions, as well as being accused of being behind the murder of the leader of the national Hindu movement in 2009.
In a statement SEF said the Interpol warrant describes Singh, who is in his 40s, as a “dangerous and violent” man.
Singh’s Interpol sheet says he is wanted by the judicial authorities of India for prosecution and/or to serve a sentence, for charges of a terrorist act, murder and unlawful activities.
Reports in Portugal claim Singh, who is said to be a staunch defender of the Punjab independence movement, had just arrived in the Algarve with his wife and four young children for a short break, when he was arrested by SEF inspectors at an Algarve hotel.
Speaking to newspaper Diário de Notícias, New York-based lawyer Gurpatwat Pannun, who defends cases involving members of the Sikh community, said the Indian “has been living as a political refugee in the UK for the past 20 years and the terrorism accusations are false.”
“He is not a terrorist. The accusations from India are politically motivated”, accused Pannun, who was due to travel to Portugal to oversee the case and says he hopes Singh is not extradited by Évora.
“Any Sikh who defends Punjab independence risks having an accusation of this type in India”, Pannun claimed.
Singh’s extradition is also contested by the Sikh Council UK, an organisation which defends the religious community in the UK.
In a post on Facebook the Sikh Council UK said it is “concerned about the welfare of Paramjeet Singh who was arrested in Portugal and faces possible deportation to India.”
“As many are aware of the case of Paramjeet Singh from the UK who has been arrested in Portugal under international Interpol law. Paramjeet Singh and his family reside in UK and were awarded indefinite leave to remain as refugee under UK/international human rights laws”, the Council elaborated, adding “Members of Sikh Council have been in liaison directly with Paramjeet Singh who is currently in custody of Immigration in Portugal.”
The council further said it is “in close contact with Singh’s wife; Contact has been made with the British Consulate in Portugal”, and “the Foreign and Commonwealth Office have been alerted with full details.”
In comments to The Portugal News, the British Embassy in Portugal explained “as Mr. Singh is not a British national we are not providing consular assistance.”
Indian arrested in Algarve wanted for murder and bombings
in Algarve · 23 Dec 2015, 12:33 · 2 Comments
India is a draconian terror state - as the world can see today.Look at the genocide in Kashmir.India is a signatory to the ICCPR and the ICESCR - but has NOT made an effective integration of the same into the legal system.
The Judicial system,besides the SC, is prejudiced,jaundiced,parochial and lackeys of Narendra Modi.
The sample of the Indian terror is that India HAS NOT signed the OP to the ICCPR and ICESCR.
India has also NOT signed or ratified the UNCAT.The Indian investigators like the CBI,NIA,IBMPOLICE are inept,corrupt and debauched.Their views have NO VALUE.dindooohindoo
If this man was a dangerous terrorist - he would NOT have got Asylum in the UK.The Sikhs are fighting for an independent state - which they were promised, by Gandhi.
IT IS THIS WANTON CRIMINALITY OF THE INDIAN STATE, WHICH IS WHAT HAD RESULTED IN THE ECHR REJECTING A SOLEMN PLEDGE,OF “NO-TORTURE”, BY THE INDIAN STATE,IN THE CASE OF CHAHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (Application no. 22414/93)
• The court also found that Mr Chahal faced a ‘real risk’ of ill-treatment contrary to Article 3 if returned to India, notwithstanding the assurance given by the Indian government that he would not be ill-treated:
o “Although the Court does not doubt the good faith of the Indian government in providing the assurances … it would appear that, despite the efforts of that government, the [National Human Rights Commission] and the Indian courts to bring about reform, the violation of human rights by certain members of the security forces in Punjab and elsewhere in India is a recalcitrant and enduring problem … Against this background, the Court is not persuaded that the above assurances would provide Mr Chahal with an adequate guarantee of safety”
By sanir sardana from Other on 04 May 2021, 15:06
If this man is sent to India - he will be killed by the inept NIA (Anti-Terror entity)
INDIAN COURTS HAVE PASSEDS TRICTURES ON ACQUITTAL OF UAPA ACCUSED (TERROR ACCUSED)
Jalandhar fast track court acquitted Manjit, seven others in a case registered against them under UAPA at Bhogpur police station in Jalandhar on September 28, 2009
Court stated “From all this evidence, the prosecution has failed to prove any link of recoveries made from accused or transactions of money with any terrorist act or organisation.Simple statement of DSP Rajinder Singh Sohal that he received secret information is not sufficient to hold the accused having committed or attempted to have committed any such offence”
UAPA case was registered against Kobad Gandhy on January 1, 2010
The court observed: “In this case, neither any recovery was affected at the instance of accused. Since the prosecution failed to prove that the accused was pertaining to a militant group or he was having any nexus with enemy countries, there is no evidence on record to show the accused was having any link with terrorist activities or militant group. ... Supreme Court... has held, that mere membership of a banned organisation cannot incriminate a person..
UAPA and Arms Act on Sept 15, 2013,at Purana Shalla police station in Gurdaspur Gurpreet Singh and 11 others
The trial court observed: “So many disclosures were recorded to show that he (Gurpreet Singh) had kept concealedand got recovered the ammunition from different parts of the country between November 7 and 9, 2014. It is highly
impossible for anyone to move such distances cities in three days. It shows prosecution only wants to implicate him by hook or crook
THE NIA IS A CORRUPT CRIMINAL ENTITY !
By samir sardana from Other on 05 May 2021, 18:55