In a universe of 25 major hubs analysed by AirAdvisor's Rest and Recharge Index (ARRI), the Portuguese capital stands out for offering above-average conditions in terms of accessibility, 24-hour operation, and a variety of security options within the terminal.
Solid choice
With a score of 22.1, Lisbon establishes itself as a solid choice for the millions of passengers who make connecting flights, especially amid the growing number of intercontinental routes, where physical recovery between flights is crucial.
Lisbon's success in this index, led by Warsaw Chopin Airport, is due to investment in infrastructure that goes beyond retail and catering.
According to Anton Radchenko, CEO of AirAdvisor, access to showers and lounge density are critical differentiating factors.
Dedicated spaces
Lisbon has positioned itself favourably to ensure that transit passengers, subject to overnight or late-night flight layovers, have dedicated spaces to "recharge their batteries." This ability to adapt to modern air transport strengthens Lisbon's competitiveness against larger hubs like Frankfurt and Amsterdam, which are also part of this elite group.
Porto Airport
Conversely, Francisco Sá Carneiro Airport in Porto faces structural challenges regarding passenger comfort during extended layovers.
The northern terminal ranks among the five least prepared in the European Union, placing it at the very bottom with only 15.1 points.
According to the study, this ranking does not reflect the overall quality of service or the usual passenger satisfaction, but focuses exclusively on the scarcity of specific rest areas and limited access to showers, which in Porto are mostly restricted to VIP lounges.
For travellers facing overnight layovers or significant delays, Porto airport also presents limitations in the density of support infrastructure relative to the volume of traffic it handles.
This disparity between the two main national airports underscores a new trend in the sector: rest infrastructure as a competitive factor. While Lisbon invests in the functionality for transit passengers, Porto demonstrates a necessary margin for progress to respond to the reality of modern travel.
For Portuguese passengers or those transiting through Portugal, AirAdvisor reminds passengers that, in case of prolonged delays, Regulation (EC) No 261 guarantees the right to assistance and accommodation. Regardless of the terminal's quality, it is advisable for travellers to keep receipts for expenses and to protect their belongings in guarded areas, using accessories such as earplugs and eye masks to mitigate infrastructure failures at lower-rated airports.












Please stop writing about the Lisbon airport or change your resources. It is in all categories the worst one I know. I recommend that Lufthansa take his over back. Lisbon as a hub no way. No seating to crowded. No space . Ugly !! Go to Doha, Singapore, Munich even Brussels and Zagreb airport is way better. I would nobody recommend to fly via Lisbon for example to South American.
By Tom from Lisbon on 19 Mar 2026, 22:41
You have got to be joking - did the airport pay someone for this rating?
LIS is 20 years out of date, it is extremely overcrowded, under-serviced and on many occasions I have passed through it there are areas the stink of sewage and uncleared food-waste.
The facilities are extremely poor. A previous commentator compares it to Dubai, Singapore and others, and frankly these are at the cutting edge of of airport comfort, spacious relaxation areas (even if not travelling business class) with facilities and services that provide for families with babies, kids & teens, solo travellers, and even the visual and hearing impaired; elderly and infirm travellers have dedicated facilities.
However, even with European airports LIS is poor. Having travelled extensively in the last year I can clearly say that Berlin, Munich, Madrid, Rome's FCO, Amsterdam and Brussels are better for transit passengers, with better facilities, services and comfort areas.
The last time I was in an airport worse than LIS was a regional airport in Egypt and Zimbabwe.
I am sure that you have a sense of loyalty towards Portugal, which is commendable, but you are meant to be a journalist that fact-checks and provides unbiased views, not 'spin'.
By Anthony Williams from Other on 20 Mar 2026, 13:14
This kind of nonsense can only have been written by someone who has not used the airport !
By Rob Good from Alentejo on 20 Mar 2026, 15:19
I’m stunned the read this information about Lisbon airport. It can only be written by a person who does not do much air travel. Perhaps they had access to an airline lounge? The airport is overcrowded with insufficient seating.
As a hub, it in no way compares with Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Singapore, Istanbul & others. Indeed, even Denpasar Bali is better.
By L from Lisbon on 20 Mar 2026, 18:48
This airport is a joke in all aspects. Stop glorifying a turd, even if it is gold layered
By Antonio C from Lisbon on 22 Mar 2026, 07:40