The Chega leader’s defence argues that the first-instance decision violates freedom of political expression and contests the daily fine of €2,500 per poster, which it deems excessive.

The appeal also seeks to lift the ban on posting similar messages in the future, arguing that the posters’ content does not constitute an unlawful offence against personality, but rather reflects a subjective interpretation of the facts by the court.

In contrast, the defence of the Roma community’s representatives, led by Ricardo Sá Fernandes, contests the appeal and emphasises that the measures imposed have already been fully complied with by the politician.

The plaintiffs’ lawyers argue that the sanctions are disproportionate and that exercising freedom of expression cannot violate human dignity or promote ethnic discrimination.

Invoking jurisprudence from the European Court of Human Rights, the prosecution reinforces that statements that impute negative behaviours to an entire ethnic group have reduced legal protection, maintaining the conviction that the initial sentence should be confirmed by higher courts.